Creating a Simple Redux Store from ScratchA Comprehensive Tutorial to Building Your Own Redux Store and Implementing Dynamic Action Types

Introduction

State management in modern web development can be a real challenge. With the user experience becoming increasingly dynamic, keeping track of multiple states in your web application can be a daunting task. That's where Redux comes into play. In its most basic form, Redux is a predictable state container for JavaScript applications. While Redux itself is quite powerful and has various middlewares to extend its functionality, the core idea behind it is straightforward.

In this tutorial, we'll take a bottom-up approach and build a simplified Redux-like store from scratch. Why "Redux-like"? Well, although the real Redux has several additional features and optimizations, understanding the underlying principles can be very empowering. It will provide you with a foundational knowledge that can help you understand many other state management solutions as well. So, buckle up for a hands-on experience!

Understanding the Basic Components

Before diving into the code, it’s crucial to grasp the fundamental components of Redux, or in our case, Redux-like architecture. At its core, Redux revolves around the "store," "reducers," and "actions." The store is a single object that holds the state of your entire application. The reducer is a function that determines how the state changes in response to an action, and actions are plain objects describing what happened.

To make this concrete, imagine you're building a counter application. The store would contain the current number, the reducer would define how to increment or decrement that number, and actions would be events like "INCREMENT" or "DECREMENT." Understanding these components not only helps in building the Redux-like system but also in scaling your web application as it grows.

Redux like store diagram

Code Examples

Dynamically Registering Actions

In the first example, actions are dynamically registered in the actionTypes object. We start by creating an initial state and defining a default action to return the current state.

// Initial state
const initialState = {
    counter: 0,
};

const actionTypes = {
    default: (state) => state,
};

// Reducer function
const reducerDefinition = (state = initialState, action) => {
    const actionFunc = actionTypes[action.type] || actionTypes.default;
    return actionFunc(state, action);
};

We then define our reducerDefinition function and the createStore function, which returns an object containing the getState, dispatch, and subscribe methods. The example also shows how to dispatch actions and how to unsubscribe from the store.

// Reducer function ... (continued)

// Store
const createStore = (reducer) => {
    let state = reducer(undefined, {});
    let listeners = [];

    return {
        getState: () => state,
        dispatch: (action) => {
            state = reducer(state, action);
            listeners.forEach((listener) => listener());
        },
        subscribe: (listener) => {
            listeners.push(listener);
            return () => {
                listeners = listeners.filter((l) => l !== listener);
            };
        },
    };
};

(() => {
    // Create a new store
    const store = createStore(reducerDefinition);

    // Define action types
    const incrementAction = (state) => ({ ...state, counter: state.counter + 1 });
    const decrementAction = (state) => ({ ...state, counter: state.counter - 1 });

    // register new action type
    // Dynamically registering actions in the actionTypes object can be convenient, but it might make it harder to understand what actions are available at a glance, especially as your application grows.
    actionTypes.INCREMENT = incrementAction;
    actionTypes.DECREMENT = decrementAction;

    // Subscribe to store updates
    const unsubscribe = store.subscribe(() => {
        /* eslint-disable */
        console.log('New state:', store.getState());
    });

    // Dispatch some actions
    store.dispatch({ type: 'INCREMENT' });
    store.dispatch({ type: 'INCREMENT' });
    store.dispatch({ type: 'DECREMENT' });

    // Unsubscribe from the store
    unsubscribe();
})();

This approach is flexible and allows you to add new actions dynamically. However, it can make the code harder to follow as your application scales.

The Initial Setup and Reducer

In the code example, we start by defining an initialState object that holds our application's initial state. In this example, it's a simple counter initialized at zero. Then comes the reducerDefinition, a function taking two parameters: state and action. Reducers specify how the application's state changes in response to actions sent to the store.

This code snippet elegantly leverages JavaScript's higher-order functions. The reducerDefinition looks up the correct function to execute based on the action type. If the action type is unrecognized, it returns the current state. This makes it easy to extend the application with new features without changing the existing codebase, promoting both readability and maintainability.

Creating the Store and Managing Subscriptions

The store holds the application's state and provides methods like getState, dispatch, and subscribe. The createStore function in our code sets up this store, initializing it with the reducer. It also manages a list of listeners who are notified when the state changes.

You'll see the subscribe method, which allows components to listen to state changes. Components can update themselves based on these changes, making your application highly reactive. The store also provides a dispatch method to send actions to the reducer, effectively changing the state and notifying all subscribers.

Dynamic Action Registration and Use Cases

What's fascinating about this code is its support for dynamically registering actions in the actionTypes object. While this approach may seem unconventional, it can be particularly useful in large-scale applications where actions might be added or modified frequently.

Use Cases and Web Development Projects

The simplicity and flexibility of this Redux-like system make it highly adaptable for a variety of projects. You could integrate this into anything from a simple to-do list application to more complex projects like e-commerce platforms or real-time dashboards. Additionally, this approach is excellent for projects involving server-side rendering, code-splitting, or even integrating with other libraries and frameworks like React or Angular.

More Code ExamplesHow to Implement Your Own Redux-like Store

It's time to get our hands dirty with some code! We'll start by exploring two code examples, each demonstrating how to implement your own Redux-like store. The first example dynamically registers actions, and the second one uses string constants for action types. Let's dive right in.

Using String Constants for Action Types

In the second example, we make use of string constants for action types (INCREMENT and DECREMENT). This can be helpful to avoid typos and to have a single source of truth for action names.

// Action Types
const INCREMENT = 'INCREMENT';
const DECREMENT = 'DECREMENT';

// Initial state
const initialState = {
    counter: 0,
};

// Action functions
const incrementAction = (state) => ({ ...state, counter: state.counter + 1 });
const decrementAction = (state) => ({ ...state, counter: state.counter - 1 });

Like the first example, we create a reducerDefinition and a createStore function, but this time, we map action types directly using string constants.

// Action functions ... (continued)
// Reducer function
const reducerDefinition = (state = initialState, action) => {
    const actionFunc = actionTypes[action.type] || actionTypes.default;
    return actionFunc(state, action);
};

// Store creation function
const createStore = (reducer) => {
    let state = reducer(undefined, {});
    let listeners = [];

    // Public API
    return {
        getState: () => state,
        dispatch: (action) => {
            state = reducer(state, action);
            listeners.forEach((listener) => listener());
        },
        subscribe: (listener) => {
            listeners.push(listener);
            return () => {
                listeners = listeners.filter((l) => l !== listener);
            };
        },
    };
};

// Application logic
(() => {
    const store = createStore(reducerDefinition);

    const unsubscribe = store.subscribe(() => {
        console.log('New state:', store.getState());
    });

    // Dispatch actions
    store.dispatch({ type: INCREMENT });
    store.dispatch({ type: INCREMENT });
    store.dispatch({ type: DECREMENT });

    // Unsubscribe from the store
    unsubscribe();
})();

The advantage of this approach is that it's easier to manage action types, especially in large applications where actions are defined in separate files or modules.

Both examples provide a solid foundation for understanding how to implement your own Redux-like store. They also demonstrate how to manage actions dynamically or with string constants, offering flexibility based on your project's requirements. Feel free to try out both methods and see which one aligns best with your web development goals.

Web Development Project Ideas

Now that you've grasped the ins and outs of creating a Redux-like store, you may be itching to implement this knowledge in real-world projects. After all, the true test of learning is applying it. Below are five web development project ideas where your custom Redux-like state management system can shine.

1. To-Do List Application

A To-Do List is perhaps the most straightforward application to start with but don't be deceived; even simple applications can teach you a lot. You can use your Redux-like store to manage tasks, categorize them, mark them as complete, and so on.

This project will provide a sandbox for practicing state transitions. For example, a task could move from 'incomplete' to 'complete' state, and this transition would be handled by your custom Redux-like store. You can even take it a step further and implement features like sorting tasks by their states, adding due dates, or categorizing them.

2. E-commerce Platform

E-commerce platforms have complex state management needs, from user authentication to product catalogs, to cart management. Implementing your Redux-like store in such a project will deepen your understanding of how state management scales.

You can begin by using your custom store to manage product listings, track the user's cart, and handle orders. As the complexity of the project grows, your Redux-like store will serve as the backbone for state management, helping you confidently navigate the project's intricacies.

3. Chat Application

Chat applications present a real challenge when it comes to state management. You have to manage user messages, online statuses, active chat rooms, and so on. This is an excellent playground for testing the efficiency and performance of your Redux-like store.

Utilizing your custom store to manage the chat history, user sessions, and even read receipts could provide invaluable insights into handling real-time data and state synchronization between the client and server.

4. Real-time Dashboard

Dashboards are all about data visualization and real-time updates. You can use your custom Redux-like store to manage the state of different widgets on the dashboard, like charts, counters, and tables.

This project will not only require managing the visual state of widgets but also the real-time data that populates them. How your store handles frequent updates and maintains performance will be an exciting challenge, providing practical experience in working with dynamic, real-time data.

5. Blogging Platform

Building a blogging platform with features like user authentication, post creation, comments, and likes will offer a well-rounded project to implement your Redux-like store. You'll need to manage various states, from user data to the list of blog posts, to comments and likes on each post.

Your custom store can be tasked with handling user sessions, storing drafted posts, and even managing UI states like modals or pop-up notifications. This project will give you a broad perspective on managing both user-generated content and interface states.

Each of these projects presents unique challenges and learning opportunities for implementing your custom Redux-like store. They offer a mix of complexity levels, allowing you to gradually build up your skills in state management, as you move from simpler to more complex applications.

Frequently Asked QuestionsImplementing a Redux-like Store in Web Development Projects

As we journey through the world of custom Redux-like state management, it's natural to have questions. Here, we've compiled some of the most frequently asked questions to help you navigate this subject more easily.

Q1: What is a Redux-like store?

Answer: A Redux-like store is a custom implementation that mimics the functionality of the Redux library, commonly used for state management in web development projects. This store provides you with methods to manage and update your application's state, such as dispatch to update the state and subscribe to listen for changes.

Q2: Why would I implement my own store instead of using Redux?

Answer: While Redux is a robust and well-maintained library, implementing your own store helps you gain a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanics of state management. This exercise can be educational and gives you the flexibility to tailor the store to your project’s specific needs.

Q3: Is it feasible to implement this in large-scale applications?

Answer: While it's possible, caution is advised. Large-scale applications often require sophisticated state management solutions. Although a custom Redux-like store may suffice for smaller projects, it may not provide all the performance optimizations and middleware support that a mature library like Redux offers.

Q4: How does the custom store handle asynchronous operations?

Answer: The examples given in the blog post are simplified and focus on synchronous state updates. To handle asynchronous operations, you can extend the store to include middleware or support for async actions, similar to how Redux Thunk or Redux Saga works.

Q5: Can I dynamically register new actions?

Answer: Yes, one of the code examples shows how you can dynamically register new actions by adding them to the actionTypes object. However, this approach can make it harder to track available actions as your application grows.

Q6: What are some real-world projects where I can implement this?

Answer: You can implement your custom Redux-like store in various projects like To-Do List apps, E-commerce platforms, chat applications, real-time dashboards, and blogging platforms. Each of these projects offers unique challenges and provides different levels of complexity for practicing state management.

Q7: Is it necessary to use string constants for action types?

Answer: Using string constants is not strictly necessary, but it is a best practice in large applications. It helps avoid typos, makes the code more maintainable, and provides a single source of truth for action types.

Q8: How do I test my custom Redux-like store?

Answer: Just like you would test a Redux store, you can use testing libraries like Jest to write unit tests for your custom store. You can test the reducer functions, actions, and even simulate state changes to ensure everything is working as expected.

We hope this FAQ section addresses some of the questions you may have had while reading this blog post. If you have more questions or want to dive deeper, feel free to reach out or explore additional resources.

Redux-like Store VS Publish-Subscribe Design Pattern: A Comparative Analysis

As you venture into the world of state management, it's important to understand the various methodologies available to make informed choices for your project. Two popular approaches often come up in conversations—Redux-like stores and the Publish-Subscribe design pattern. While they may appear similar on the surface, there are subtle differences worth noting.

Redux-like StoreA Centralized Truth

In a Redux-like store, there is a single, centralized state, often referred to as the "single source of truth." Every change to this state goes through a well-defined flow, usually involving an action being dispatched and a reducer function being executed. This makes the system very predictable, as it's easy to trace how a state change occurred.

Additionally, Redux-like stores often come with robust debugging tools, enabling you to inspect the state and actions at any given time. This makes it easier to manage complex applications, as you can see the entire application state and history. However, it's worth mentioning that a Redux-like store, by design, is more rigid in its structure. Your application logic needs to adapt to this flow, which can sometimes add boilerplate code.

Publish-Subscribe PatternA Decentralized Approach

The Publish-Subscribe (Pub-Sub) design pattern, on the other hand, operates on a more decentralized model. In this pattern, publishers send messages without having knowledge of the subscribers who consume these messages. Similarly, subscribers listen for certain messages without knowing who the publishers are. The system is more event-driven, with components in your application acting as either publishers or subscribers, and sometimes both.

This pattern offers a higher level of flexibility and decoupling, as individual components can publish or subscribe to events independently. It's particularly useful in scenarios where you need real-time updates and multi-directional data flows. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of predictability and debuggability. Tracking down how a certain state change occurred could be more challenging, as there's no single flow that manages all state changes.

Which One to Use?

Choosing between a Redux-like store and the Pub-Sub pattern often boils down to the needs of your specific project. If you require a rigid, traceable system where the state's predictability is of utmost importance, a Redux-like store is the way to go. It's particularly useful for large-scale applications where complex state management is a key concern.

On the flip side, if you're building an application that requires a lot of real-time updates, or if you prefer a more flexible, decentralized approach to state management, the Pub-Sub pattern is an excellent choice. It allows you to handle multiple events efficiently, though it may make the system less predictable.

In summary, both the Redux-like store and the Pub-Sub design pattern have their merits and shortcomings. Your project's specific requirements will largely dictate which approach is more suitable for your needs. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each can help you make an informed decision that best serves your project.

Redux-like Store, MVC, and MVVMUnveiling the Connections and Differences

When it comes to architectural patterns and state management in web development, you're likely to come across a variety of approaches. Three methodologies that often steal the spotlight are Redux-like stores, the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern, and the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) pattern. While each offers a unique way to structure your application and manage state, understanding how they align or differ can be crucial. This comparison aims to shed light on these key paradigms, focusing on their distinct features and use-cases.

Redux-like StoreA Singular State Container

A Redux-like store focuses solely on state management, providing a centralized data store for your application. It adheres to a unidirectional data flow, meaning all state updates are processed through actions and reducers. The primary strength of a Redux-like store is its predictability. Since all state updates follow a strict flow, debugging becomes much more straightforward. Additionally, Redux-like architectures often come with powerful development tools to aid in state inspection and time-travel debugging. However, it should be noted that Redux-like stores usually don't concern themselves with how the state is presented, leaving the UI implementation flexible but separate.

Model-View-Controller (MVC)A Triad of Concerns

MVC is an architectural pattern that separates an application into three interconnected components: the Model, the View, and the Controller. The Model represents the data and the business rules controlling it. The View displays the data, and the Controller acts as an interface between Model and View. MVC supports a more segmented approach to building applications but can become cumbersome as the project grows in complexity. Although it can be combined with a Redux-like store, MVC inherently offers a way to manage state (Model), handle user input (Controller), and present data (View), effectively serving as a one-stop solution for both state management and UI rendering.

Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM)A Two-Way Data Binding Star

MVVM is another architectural pattern where the Model represents the data, the View represents the UI, and the ViewModel acts as a facilitator that handles the business logic and data presentation. What sets MVVM apart is its emphasis on two-way data binding between the View and the ViewModel. This means that changes to the View are automatically reflected in the ViewModel and vice versa. MVVM is often favored in frameworks that support two-way data binding out of the box, like Angular. However, this automatic binding can sometimes make it more difficult to debug or understand the flow of data, especially in complex applications.

Summing UpWhich Should You Choose?

Choosing between a Redux-like store, MVC, or MVVM often boils down to the specific requirements of your project and the development environment you're working in. If state management is your only concern, a Redux-like store can be a standalone solution. If you're looking for an all-encompassing architecture for both UI and state, MVC or MVVM might be more up your alley.

Redux-like stores can also be integrated into MVC and MVVM architectures as the "Model" to manage state more predictably. Ultimately, your choice should align with the complexity of your application, your team's expertise, and the specific challenges you're looking to solve. The beauty of software architecture lies in its flexibility—each pattern has its own strengths and weaknesses, and often, a hybrid approach yields the best results.

Conclusion

Understanding the core mechanics of state management systems like Redux can significantly enhance your skills as a web developer. Building a simplified Redux-like store from scratch can be a great learning experience that prepares you for the challenges of state management in complex applications. By creating your own Redux-like store, you gain a more in-depth understanding of how popular libraries handle state and how you can customize or even create your own solutions.

We walked you through the foundational principles of a Redux-like store, delved into the role of reducers, actions, and dynamic action registration, and highlighted some practical use-cases where you could implement this knowledge. This understanding can act as a stepping stone to grasping more complex state management libraries and practices, setting you well on your way to becoming an expert web developer.